Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 1914mauser

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 30
1
Model 1910 Pistol / Re: mauser 1910
« on: April 20, 2019, 09:43:19 PM »
You are welcome!

Regards,

2
Model 1914 Pistol / Re: Trigger Guard Eagle
« on: April 20, 2019, 09:42:39 PM »
I can relate. I hope it works out for you.

Regards,

3
Model 1910 Pistol / Re: mauser 1910
« on: April 19, 2019, 12:47:23 PM »
Yes, 1910 is usually used to describe the .25 caliber variations. 107442 is a 1910/14 new model and should have numbered internal parts as you describe.

Regards,

4
Model 1910 Pistol / Re: mauser 1910
« on: April 19, 2019, 08:40:58 AM »
What is the serial number? and are we discussing a .25 or .32 caliber example? The earlier variations had more of the internal parts numbered than the later models.

Regards,

5
Model 1914 Pistol / Re: Trigger Guard Eagle
« on: April 09, 2019, 07:00:52 PM »
Two birds in the hand? I would be very tempted to have another. The Prussian Eagle is a rare bird. I have a 1914 with one, a Red-9 with one and a 1920 rework with one. One more is always welcome.

Regards,

6
Glad we could help!

Regards,

7
http://www.mauserguns.com/forum/index.php/topic,469.0.html
Read here, possible the same problem, look at my picture and the comments. Or wait for the comment  from Burgess the specialist in Mausers.
Hello, geert45.  Thanks for your fast reply.  I will try removing the "Magazine Catch" bar but I have the same question that Kev Hernandez did:  Is it safe to remove it with the slide and side cover on the gun?


Also, please confirm that what your are calling the "Magazine Spring" is in fact the long flat piece on which the bottom is the "magazine catch"?  (Numrich refers to as "Magazine Catch".)


Thanks again for your suggestion and link.  But, I'll wait till you confirm the part that I should remove.  :-)


It does sound like removing the magazine catch spring could be the solution. Yes,  it is safe to remove the spring with the slide in place. Just a review. pull slide back till it locks, remove barrel retaining rod, remove barrel, insert magazine and allow slide to move forward to its rest position, pull trigger to release striker, allow slide to move slightly forward 1/4 inch and remove magazine, at this point the slide should come off the front of the frame. If not try removing the magazine catch.

Regards,

8
Yes, some internal small parts were still numbered on the post war commercials but the numbering of small parts gradually decreased through out production.
The fire blue was not discontinued till the post 1934 variation.

Regards,

9
Model 1934 Pistol / Re: Date of Manufacturer
« on: March 04, 2019, 06:44:32 PM »
I don't know of anyone who can get you the month but the data I have places the year as 1940. It should have the Eagle/N proof mark.

Regards,

10
C96 / C12 Broomhandle / Re: Frankenstein Mauser
« on: February 18, 2019, 07:39:30 AM »
It is hard to tell what this was but it looks like one of the 1970's  Chinese imports that the grip frame was so badly rusted that it was made into a carbine that then someone made the stock into a pistol grip. It is far from how it looked when it left the factory.

Regards,

11
C96 / C12 Broomhandle / Re: Bolo Stock
« on: February 13, 2019, 07:40:32 PM »
Thank you!
The link does not work for me but yes the stock pictured above appears to be a correct Mauser C96 short stock.

Regards,

12
C96 / C12 Broomhandle / Re: Bolo Stock
« on: February 12, 2019, 07:03:37 PM »
Without seeing it I cannot say for sure but Mauser did make shorter stocks for the pre WWI pistols with the smaller grip frame or "Bolo". They are not very common and I would love to have one as I just acquired a Pre War small grip frame example.

Regards,

13
C96 / C12 Broomhandle / Re: Officers pistol or Bolo discussion
« on: February 04, 2019, 07:04:34 PM »
My father always referred to them as "Military Mauser pistols". I always liked that name for them.

Regards,

14
C96 / C12 Broomhandle / Re: Officers pistol or Bolo discussion
« on: February 04, 2019, 07:47:16 AM »
This is basically the theory I am forming but I have some more information to review before I commit to it.

Regards,

15
C96 / C12 Broomhandle / Re: Officers pistol or Bolo discussion
« on: February 01, 2019, 07:23:28 AM »
It is great to get perspectives from European collectors here on the forum. It is curious no American collectors are commenting. Though I have not found many American collectors of the C96 that participate in forum discussions. They appear to be either technology challenged or just unwilling to engage in discussions. As the term "Bolo" does not have a clear origin its use seem to be equally confused.

Regards, 

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 30