Messages

496

Model 1910 Pistol / Re: Values

« on: July 22, 2014, 01:09:26 PM »

 Jim - Most .25 and .32 caliber pocket models fall in the $250-350 value range. This is for common variations in very good or better condition. The serial number of the example in question places it as a common variation but at 75% I would most likely value it at $200. For a pocket model to achieve upward of $350 it would need to be a less common variation or have a desirable use marking (police, army, navy, retailor etc...) or be in like new condition. There are enough of these around to require collection quality examples to be in very good or better condition. Currently in the market (on line auctions) many sellers are starting/asking far more that actual value but you will rarely see sales at inflated prices.  IMHO for what it is worth.
 
Regards,
 

497

General Discussion / Re: Mauser Model-1910 - 1934

« on: July 22, 2014, 07:19:40 AM »

akontra - I am a bit confused by your post. If you will list them by serial number I can provide the correct model designation as well as the year of manufacture. The one without a serial number post a picture of and I will tell you what I can.
 
Regards,
Burgess Mason

498

Model 1910 Pistol / Re: threaded muzzle on a 1910

« on: July 13, 2014, 06:35:52 PM »

I have seen the auction, I have also seen another Mauser with a threaded barrel. IMHO both were a gunsmith modification. The one on gunbroker has a later type adapter. In either case it is not factory work.

Regards,

499

Model 1914 Pistol / Re: 1914 Mauser who buys these

« on: July 09, 2014, 07:18:41 AM »

I do, sometimes. Post a picture or list it on GunBroker.com
Regards,
 

500

Model 1934 Pistol / Re: eagle l 1934

« on: June 30, 2014, 07:39:25 AM »

Yes, It looks a bit high considering condition but that is to be expected form a dealer.
 

501

Model 1934 Pistol / Re: eagle l 1934

« on: June 26, 2014, 07:33:22 AM »

Yes, that is me. I use the 1914mauser user name on all the firearms related sites I frequent. I also know the user who bid aganist me.
Regards,
 

502

Model 1934 Pistol / Re: eagle l 1934

« on: June 25, 2014, 04:32:18 PM »

Yes, It appeared to be a nice example of a police marked 1934.
Regards,
 
 

503

Model 1914 Pistol / Re: Mauser 1910/14

« on: June 18, 2014, 04:58:35 PM »

geert - Yours is the later type safety release on a wide spring with the button centered on the spring. I am sorry to say but I do not have a spare. I will keep my eye out for one for you.
Regards,
Burgess

504

Model 1910 Pistol / Re: part

« on: June 06, 2014, 10:24:39 AM »

Have you tried GunBroker.com or GunAuctions.com? If you do a search for pistol parts and then narrow the search with "mauser*" there are always auctions for parts.

Regards,

505

General Discussion / Re: It is so hard to understand. We unpublished the Mauser-Nickl prototypes?

« on: June 05, 2014, 12:25:03 PM »

 
Howard,
 
This is the same guy who has posted the same pictures on forums all over the web. The same guy you tried to buy from. He argues with anyone who says his claims are false and fails to provide any additional pictures to prove different. He thinks they are worth 100K. He has been banned or his threads have been locked on several forums. His latest round of post started on GunValues board where I told him they were worth between $10-20K and he argued. Then he resurrected some old threads here and on Still’s forum. I have tried to draw him out to provide some proof, pictures, etc… but he threw out some insults and went silent just as he did before. His latest username on the other forums is “sauerwerk “. I would appreciate discussing his examples but have little to go on as he refuses to engage.
 
Regards,
 
Burgess.
 

506

WTP / Re: WTP 2 grip screws

« on: June 05, 2014, 09:30:03 AM »

Greg,
Do not drill out and re-tap the threads. It sounds like you have a decent example and that will hurt collector value. I have amassed a good amount of WTP  parts. I will look and see if I have the screws you need. First please let me verify which model of WTP you have. I can determine this by the serial number. If you don't want to post the number on the web you can e-mail me at fxdx21@hotmail.com. A picture or 2 would be great too. I would like to see what the clear grips look like.
Regards,
Burgess
 

507

General Mauser Pistol Questions / Re: Unpublished Mechanism System Mauser - Josef Nickl

« on: May 30, 2014, 03:13:03 PM »

YOU ARE WRONG AND YOU REFUSE TO LISTEN TO THOSE IN THE COLLECTING COMMUNITY WHO KNOW.
That is why you are ridiculed or locked out on every forum on the web that you have posted questions about these pistols then argued with the people who can actually have an intelligent discussion with you about them. If you fail to provide proof that what you are being told is not correct it is impossible to carry on a discussion with you. I understand that the language barrier is part of the difficulty but it seems beyond that. It appears that you have decided you know what you have and what they are worth and anyone who tell you something different, you say does not know what they are talking about. YOU ARE INCORRECT! SHOW US WE ARE WRONG BY PROVIDING PICTURES THAT SHOW THE INNER WORKINGS OF YOUR PISTOLS AND VIEWS FROM ALL SIDES. Otherwise continue to argue and remain uninformed, incorrect and rejected by the very people whom you have solicited help from.

Regards,
Burgess Mason

508

General Mauser Pistol Questions / Re: Unpublished Mechanism System Mauser - Josef Nickl

« on: May 29, 2014, 02:51:56 PM »

Please provide some proof. Otherwise your claim means nothing.
 
 

509

General Mauser Pistol Questions / Re: Unpublished Mechanism System Mauser - Josef Nickl

« on: May 29, 2014, 10:24:32 AM »

Please respond in English. Here is a translation of your post.
"Hello:

Actually this topic has me sick.

For the last time, I explain to you and anyone who says that my guns are published in books.

That is not so. Because they are a different size and they also know that the mechanical systems of the same.

People like you, take a quisio to anyone.

If you want to know that neither the very pistols Mauser museum has in its collection, here I am.

regards

Postscript: At least you were little apology floor cuts. Some have well deserved their answers and others deserve more ...

The mine is not personal, but you seem to not want to understand. As the saying goes "There is so deaf as those who will not hear"
 
My reply
The fact that an example like yours has been published in a book is just that, a fact. If you wish to contest that please offer proof. Othewise admit that you have made a mistake.
It is clear that English is not your primary language but translations loose some meaning in translation.
I am telling you that you are the one who is not listening. Everyone is telling you the same thing. That there is knowledge about the Nickl pistols but you want to be able to say your pistols are special, unknown, and unique. You refuse to discuss why or how yours are different than the ones that are known about. Other than a few pictures and your claims you provide no evidence to prove you are correct and everyone else is wrong so until you are ready to have a conversation and consider input from the collecting community you will continue to appear to have a closed mind.
Regards,
 
 

510

General Mauser Pistol Questions / Re: Unpublished Mechanism System Mauser - Josef Nickl

« on: May 28, 2014, 03:51:54 PM »

 Mr. Gomez,
Your pistols are rare prototypes; they are not unknown to collectors. They have been described in books.  As they are prototypes they would never have been listed in catalogues, as they were never put into production or sold to the public. You have posted these on several Internet forums where you have been told these things by the world wide collecting community and still you continue to make false assumptions about them. It is time for you to back up your claims or admit when you are wrong. Your pride is standing in the way of having an open discussion and learning everything you can about these examples. At this point it may be difficult to get advanced collectors/researchers to speak with you because of how you have reacted when you were told things you did not agree with. You posted confidential e-mails from a collector who was negotiating to buy these from you when I believe you never intended to sell them. You have edited your posts to gibberish on forums after you solicited information on your examples and you have insulted people who have tried to help you.
Regards,
Burgess Mason